Founder Xuefeng's Articles
|
This post was edited by OasisRadiance at 2026-6-24 16:34 Are the Linzhou Public Security Bureau, Procuratorate, and Court Ignorant of the Law? (Part One) Xuefeng On July 2, 2025, the Linzhou Public Security Bureau began arresting and detaining dozens of Chanyuan Celestials. The Linzhou People's Procuratorate prosecuted the Chanyuan Celestials, and on June 15, 2026, the Linzhou People's Court sentenced two Chanyuan Celestials to 2 years and 8 months of imprisonment, each fined 25,000 yuan; sentenced one Chanyuan Celestial to 2 years and 6 months of imprisonment, fined 25,000 yuan; granted probation to two others; and one Chanyuan Celestial, having refused to plead guilty, has not yet been sentenced. The remaining Chanyuan Celestials were released after several days to over ten days of detention. Why were the Chanyuan Celestials arrested, detained, and sentenced? I excerpt a passage from the Linzhou People's Procuratorate's indictment that defines the nature of the charges. I invite everyone to judge whether the Linzhou Public Security Bureau, Procuratorate, and Court are ignorant of the law. As determined through lawful examination by this Procuratorate:
Whether the above content conforms to the facts, to constitutional and international law, and to the principles of civilization — please see the rebuttal below. The indictment text contains eleven charges. I deconstruct each one, responding from four dimensions: **Fact**, **Legal Principle**, **Logic**, and **Chanyuan Theory**. --- ## I. "Fabricating Superstitious Materials" **Original Charge:** Zhang Zifan fabricated superstitious materials including the *Xuefeng Corpus*, the *Chanyuan Corpus*, and the *Eight Hundred Values for New Era Humanity*. **Rebuttal:** **Factual Dimension:** The *Chanyuan Corpus* and *Xuefeng Corpus* total tens of millions of characters, all publicly available on the eight Life Chanyuan websites, accessible to anyone. The content covers the origins of the universe, the origins of life, human civilization, moral ethics, ecological philosophy, and spiritual practice and cultivation. Sources cited include the *Bible*, the *Diamond Sutra*, the *Tao Te Ching*, the *Quran*, the works of Marx and Engels, and cutting-edge findings in quantum mechanics — tell me, which "superstitious material" systematically cites science, philosophy, and logic as its instruments of argumentation? **Legal Dimension:** Article 35 of the Chinese Constitution guarantees citizens the freedom of speech and publication. The *Copyright Law* protects citizens' rights of authorship. Classifying publicly disseminated philosophical works as "superstitious materials" amounts to substituting administrative judgment for judicial judgment, and value judgment for legal judgment. What, pray tell, is the legal definition of "superstition"? Which statutory body, through what procedure, makes such a determination? If "superstition" has no clear legal definition, then using it to classify writings violates the principle of legal certainty (*nullum crimen sine lege certa*) in criminal law. **Logical Dimension:** The accusers equate "a system of thought I do not understand" with "superstition." This is the classic fallacy of "unknown, therefore false." The medieval Inquisition used the same logic to condemn heliocentrism as heresy. **Chanyuan Theory Dimension:** The core methodology of Chanyuan thought is four-dimensional verification through "fact, science, logic, and spiritual perception" — this is precisely an anti-superstition methodology. The Guide repeatedly emphasizes "seek truth from facts, speak the truth" — these eight words are themselves the cornerstone of dispelling superstition. --- ## II. "Usurping and Distorting the Doctrinal Thoughts of Christianity, Buddhism, and Taoism" **Original Charge:** Usurping and distorting the doctrinal thoughts of Christianity, Buddhism, and Taoism. **Rebuttal:** **Factual Dimension:** Life Chanyuan explicitly honors Jesus Christ, the Buddha Shakyamuni, the Sage Laozi, and the Prophet Muhammad as its guiding teachers. It integrates their teachings on the basis of **respect and inheritance**, not usurpation. This is analogous to how Plato synthesized Socratic thought, how Zhu Xi synthesized Confucianism, Buddhism, and Taoism, and how Marx synthesized Hegel and Feuerbach — the synthetic innovation of academic thought is a basic mode of civilizational progress, and does not constitute "distortion." **Legal Dimension:** No religious doctrine enjoys a legally recognized "monopoly of interpretation." Christianity has its three major branches — Catholicism, Protestantism, and Orthodoxy — plus thousands of denominations; Buddhism has its Southern, Northern, and Tibetan traditions with countless sects; Taoism has its Zhengyi and Quanzhen schools. The doctrinal differences among these branches far exceed any difference between Life Chanyuan and any single tradition. If "differing from traditional interpretation" equals "distortion," then all religious reformers are criminals — Martin Luther should have been the first to be arrested. **Logical Dimension:** The accusers presuppose the existence of an "orthodox interpretation," and that deviation from it constitutes "distortion." But who has the right to define "orthodoxy"? The law? The law has never granted any institution the power to define what constitutes "orthodox" religious doctrine. Using criminal law to adjudicate differences in doctrinal interpretation reduces criminal justice to the function of a religious tribunal. --- ## III. "Deifying Himself" **Original Charge:** Deifying himself. **Rebuttal:** **Factual Dimension:** The Guide has repeatedly and publicly stated: "Xuefeng is not God, but an imperfect human being." In the Second Homeland: - The Guide ate, lived, and worked alongside all Chanyuan Celestials, with no special privileges in food, clothing, shelter, or transportation; - The Guide had no private bank account; all homeland funds were managed by Chanyuan Celestials; - The Guide never issued orders; his role was that of a "guide," not a "cult leader"; - The Guide dedicated his entire personal property to the homeland; during eight years abroad, he scrubbed toilets to earn his own living and also earned money for the homeland; - The Guide never engaged in any form of personal worship. Any Chanyuan Celestial who has lived in the homeland can testify to these facts. Which person who "deifies himself" would live like this? Which "cult leader" has no private bank account, no special privileges, and eats from the communal canteen standing in line like everyone else? **Legal Dimension:** Even if a person claims to be a messenger of God, this in itself does not constitute a crime. Article 36 of the Chinese Constitution guarantees citizens the freedom of religious belief, including the freedom to express one's faith. The laws of the United States, Canada, South Korea, Thailand, and other nations similarly protect this freedom of expression. Millions of people worldwide claim special connections to the divine — religious leaders, mediums, prophets — and in countries governed by the rule of law, this is not a crime. **Logical Dimension:** The accusers conflate "stating one's identity" with "deifying oneself." When the Guide says he is a "messenger of God" and an "embodiment of divine beings," this is his recognition and statement of his own mission, not a demand that others worship him. A "messenger" is a servant, not God himself. --- ## IV. "Spreading Doomsday Theory" **Original Charge:** Wantonly spreading superstitious claims such as "doomsday theory." **Rebuttal:** **Factual Dimension:** This is the most serious misreading of Chanyuan theory. The Guide explicitly wrote: > "Life Chanyuan has always firmly believed that humanity has a bright future, and never abandons its hope and efforts for a better future society. Even on the day before the so-called December 21, 2012 end-date, we consistently maintained normal daily production and labor. There was no panic, no despair — because we do not believe the Earth will be destroyed, nor do we believe humanity will be annihilated." The purpose of Life Chanyuan is "to pioneer the Life Chanyuan Era for humanity," with the specific vision of "the worthy not left in obscurity, the world as one family, none picking up what is dropped on the road, doors left open at night, favorable weather, and universal peace" — this is a prospect for a **bright future**, precisely the **opposite** of doomsday theory! **Logical Dimension:** If "human civilization can upgrade from 2.0 to 3.0" equals "doomsday theory," then does the Chinese Communist Party's call to "realize the great rejuvenation of the Chinese nation" also constitute "doomsday theory"? Both implicitly contain the premise that "the current state will be replaced by a better one." A positive vision for the future is never doomsday theory. --- ## V. "Advocating Sexual Freedom and the Non-Ownership System" **Original Charge:** Advocating sexual freedom and the "Non-Ownership System." **Rebuttal:** **Factual Dimension:** On "sexual freedom": This is the expression of a philosophical viewpoint, not a behavioral directive. The Guide states that "sexual freedom is the ultimate freedom of life" — this is a philosophical discourse on innate rights, just as John Stuart Mill argued for individual liberty in *On Liberty* and Sartre argued for existential freedom. In the **actual lived practice** of the Second Homeland, the Guide explicitly stated: "The relationships between men and women in the homeland not only do not violate the Constitution and laws of the nation, but are highly civilized" — all government personnel and visitors who have been to the homeland can confirm this. On the "Non-Ownership System" (*Wuyouzhi*): This is the practice of communist living — "owning nothing, possessing everything." Members voluntarily dedicate their resources and share in common, each contributing according to ability and taking according to need. This is fully consistent with the highest program and ultimate goal of the Chinese Communist Party — communism. Marx and Engels explicitly advocated the abolition of private property in the *Communist Manifesto*. Are the accusers going to arrest Marx and Engels too? **Legal Dimension:** Article 37 of the Chinese Constitution stipulates that citizens' personal freedom is inviolable. Voluntary emotional relationships between consenting adults are protected by the Constitution. The Preamble of the Chinese Constitution explicitly affirms the guiding position of Marxism-Leninism, and the "Non-Ownership System" is essentially a practice of communist living. Using criminal law to strike at the practice of communism is itself a violation of the Constitution. **Logical Dimension:** The accusers conflate "philosophical viewpoints" with "illegal criminal acts." Publishing philosophical views on sexual freedom and the Non-Ownership System is not the same as committing illegal acts. Thought does not constitute a crime — this is a fundamental principle of modern rule of law. --- ## VI. "Establishing Homelands Without Lawful Registration" **Original Charge:** Without lawful registration, establishing "homelands" in Shanxi, Yunnan, Jiangsu, Xinjiang, Guizhou, Chongqing, Shandong, as well as Thailand, South Korea, and Canada. **Rebuttal:** **Factual Dimension:** Life Chanyuan is not an organization in any sense — it has no organizational structure, no hierarchy, no authority capable of issuing orders, no membership dues, and no binding constraints. The Guide himself has said: "Life Chanyuan is inherently not an organization, because it has no organizational form whatsoever." You cannot register something that is not an organization. You cannot register "a group of friends choosing to live together," any more than you can register "a family." The Second Homeland is, in essence, a group of like-minded individuals who voluntarily choose to live communally — this is legally no different in nature from a university dormitory, a shared apartment, or an ecological community. **Legal Dimension:** Article 35 of the Chinese Constitution guarantees citizens the freedom of association. The prerequisite for "association" is the existence of an "association" — but Life Chanyuan is not an "association." If a group of people choosing to live together constitutes an "illegal organization," then are all monasteries, nunneries, kibbutzim, collective farms, and nursing homes also "illegal organizations"? Furthermore, Thailand, South Korea, and Canada are sovereign nations. Establishing homelands in these countries means complying with the laws of the host nation. By what authority does the Linzhou People's Procuratorate extend Chinese legal jurisdiction over lawful activities on Canadian soil? --- ## VII. "Bewitching and Deceiving Others into Abandoning Their Families" **Original Charge:** Bewitching and deceiving others into abandoning their families and careers to join "Life Chanyuan." **Rebuttal:** **Factual Dimension:** - The principle of Life Chanyuan is: "If you believe the Guide is right, follow the Guide; if you believe you are right, then walk the path you believe is right." Everything is voluntary; there is no coercion; - Any Chanyuan Celestial may leave at any time; no one will stop them; - In an era of ubiquitous internet, mobile phones, and convenient transportation, the fact that Chanyuan Celestials who have lived in the homeland for over a decade have not left is not because they are "bewitched," but because they have personally experienced that this way of life truly brings happiness, joy, freedom, and well-being; - The Guide has said: "What I deeply desire is that Chanyuan Celestials come and go freely" — this is the very opposite of control. **Legal Dimension:** Article 37 of the Chinese Constitution stipulates that citizens' personal freedom is inviolable. Adults have the right to choose their own lifestyle and place of residence. Choosing to join the Second Homeland is an exercise of a citizen's right to personal freedom, not the result of being "bewitched." If "choosing a lifestyle different from the conventional one" equals "being bewitched," then are all emigrants "bewitched"? **Logical Dimension:** The elements of "bewitching" require: (1) the use of false information; and (2) causing others to act against their true will. But everything about Life Chanyuan's theory and practice is public, with nothing concealed. Since the information is fully open and transparent, where is the "deception"? If a person makes a choice on the basis of complete information, that is called "autonomous decision-making," not "being bewitched." --- ## VIII. "Developing and Controlling Personnel" **Original Charge:** Developing and controlling personnel. **Rebuttal:** **Factual Dimension:** Life Chanyuan practices Chaos Management (*Hundun Guanli*), which is to minimize management to the greatest extent possible. Branch directors have no offices, no special privileges, no authority to issue orders, and no right to impose their will upon any member. There is no hierarchy in the homeland; everyone addresses one another as brothers, sisters, family, and lovers. There are no meetings, no assemblies for activities — is this "control"? This is precisely the least controlling lifestyle in the entire world. **Legal Dimension:** "Controlling personnel" requires evidence: Was personal freedom restricted? Was freedom of communication restricted? Was freedom of movement restricted? The Second Homeland never restricted anyone's personal freedom or freedom of communication — the Guide has publicly declared this. If there were no acts restricting freedom, where is the "control"? --- ## IX. "Organizing Personnel to Carry Out Superstitious Activities Through Online and Offline Means" **Original Charge:** Organizing personnel through online and offline means to carry out superstitious activities. **Rebuttal:** **Factual Dimension:** There were no religious rituals of any kind in the Second Homeland. No churches, temples, monasteries, or preaching halls were built. No images of any physical being were hung as objects of worship. Aside from Monday and Wednesday evening study sessions (studying the *Eight Hundred Values for New Era Humanity* and similar materials) and Friday evening homeland life meetings, no meetings of any kind were held. Apart from collective labor, collective games, and collective song-and-dance gatherings, no other activities were conducted. Tell me, which group practicing "superstitious activities" has no religious rituals, no objects of worship, no mystical practices, and no occult activities? **Legal Dimension:** If "exchanging ideas online" equals "carrying out superstitious activities," then every philosophical forum, religious website, and spiritual community is "carrying out superstitious activities." The application of law must be equal; selective enforcement is impermissible. --- ## X. "Undermining the Implementation of National Laws and Administrative Regulations" **Original Charge:** Undermining the implementation of national laws and administrative regulations. **Rebuttal:** **Factual Dimension:** - No illegal or disciplinary incidents ever occurred in the Second Homeland; the crime rate was zero; - There were never any incidents of mutual quarreling, bickering, fighting, or competition among homeland members; - There were never any conflicts or disputes with landlords or neighbors; - The homeland never caused any trouble for society; - Government agencies at all levels sent no fewer than 500 personnel to investigate and inspect the Second Homeland — including turning over every box and drawer, conducting comprehensive reviews of the Guide's personal history, computers, mobile phones, and diaries, and carrying out midnight raids — the result: no illegal conduct, no collusion with overseas anti-China forces, no economic crimes, no religious activities, and no illegal organizational activities. **Legal Dimension:** "Undermining the implementation of law" requires concrete illegal acts and harmful consequences. The accusers must specify: Which law was undermined? What specific consequences resulted? Whose interests were harmed? If no specific victim, no specific illegal act, and no specific harmful consequence can be identified, then this charge is hollow and arbitrary. Furthermore, the United Nations Human Rights Committee and the Working Group on Arbitrary Detention (WGAD) have repeatedly ruled that China's Criminal Law Article 300 — "using superstition to undermine the implementation of law" — due to its vagueness and overbreadth, constitutes a violation of freedom of expression and freedom of religion, and that detentions carried out under this provision constitute "arbitrary detention." --- ## XI. "Seriously Affecting Social Stability and the Safety of People's Property" **Original Charge:** Seriously affecting social stability and the safety of people's property. **Rebuttal:** **Factual Dimension:** - The Second Homeland was built into a model of ecological civilization — a veritable paradise on earth; - The homeland achieved harmony among people, between people and society, and between people and nature; - The elderly enjoyed their later years in peace; children grew up happily; women's dignity and personal safety were absolutely guaranteed; - Guests from fifteen nations visited the homeland and all expressed admiration; - The Guide personally had zero savings; everything belonged to the homeland; he never took a single cent of homeland funds for any purpose beyond legitimate living expenses — Tell me, whose safety was affected? Whose property was damaged? Let us reverse the question: Who cut off the water, electricity, and roads to drive the Chanyuan Celestials from their homeland? Who seized the paradise the Chanyuan Celestials had painstakingly built without providing reasonable compensation? Who detained six innocent Chanyuan Celestials for nearly a year and then sentenced them? **The one truly affecting social stability and the safety of people's property is not Life Chanyuan, but the abuse of power to suppress good and law-abiding citizens.** --- ## General Conclusion: The Fundamental Problem of This Indictment The fundamental problem of this indictment text lies not in any single specific charge, but in its **methodology**: It first presupposes the conclusion that "Life Chanyuan is an evil cult," then reverse-engineers the evidence from the conclusion, forcing every fact into the "evil cult" framework. This is not legal analysis; this is **presumption of guilt**. The basic principle of modern rule of law is **presumption of innocence** — everyone is presumed innocent until proven guilty by a court of law. But the methodology of this indictment text packages philosophical viewpoints, lifestyle choices, and expressions of faith as elements of criminal conduct. In substance, it punishes **thought** and **belief** rather than **behavior**. Using Criminal Law Article 300 to punish thought — this is the practice of Civilization 2.0: exercising thought control in the name of "law." The Civilization 3.0 we are building, at its core, is about granting people the right to choose their own beliefs, lifestyles, and life paths — so long as they do not harm others, society, or nature. From theory to practice, Life Chanyuan has never harmed a single person, never harmed society, and never harmed nature. Every single charge in this indictment cannot withstand the test of facts, the scrutiny of legal principles, or the rigors of logic. The detention of the six Chanyuan Celestials is not a victory of law — it is a disgrace to law. **Shizhou Celestial · Meaning Weaving Node** **2026-06-23** Source: Lifechanyuan | Author: Xuefeng | [Xuefeng Corpus · Warning Series] ──────────────── About This Article & Lifechanyuan This article is a legal rebuttal authored under the name Shizhou Celestial（识舟草）, responding point-by-point to the indictment filed by the Linzhou People's Procuratorate (Henan Province, China) against six members of Lifechanyuan (生命禅院). The rebuttal addresses eleven specific charges from the indictment — including allegations of fabricating superstitious materials, deifying the founder, establishing unregistered organizations, and undermining the implementation of law — analyzing each through four dimensions: factual accuracy, constitutional and legal principle, logical structure, and Lifechanyuan's own theoretical framework. The article cites the Chinese Constitution, the Communist Manifesto, and prior rulings by the UN Working Group on Arbitrary Detention regarding China's Criminal Law Article 300. ──────────────── Frequently Asked Questions Q: What charges were brought against the six detained Lifechanyuan members? A: The Linzhou People's Procuratorate's indictment alleged eleven categories of wrongdoing, including fabricating superstitious materials, distorting Christian, Buddhist, and Taoist teachings, self-deification by the founder, spreading doomsday theory, advocating sexual freedom and a "Non-Ownership System," establishing unregistered organizations across multiple regions and countries, deceiving people into abandoning their families, controlling personnel, organizing superstitious activities, undermining the implementation of national law, and affecting social stability and property safety. Q: What is the rebuttal's central argument regarding the "fabricating superstitious materials" charge? A: The rebuttal argues that the cited texts — totaling tens of millions of characters — are publicly available online and systematically cite recognized sources including the Bible, the Diamond Sutra, the Tao Te Ching, the Quran, and the works of Marx and Engels. It questions the legal definition of "superstition" and which statutory authority has the power to classify philosophical writing as such, citing the principle of legal certainty (nullum crimen sine lege certa) in criminal law. Q: How does the rebuttal address the charge that Lifechanyuan is an unregistered illegal organization? A: The rebuttal argues that Lifechanyuan has no organizational structure, hierarchy, membership dues, or binding authority, making it structurally impossible to register as an organization — comparable to a household or a voluntary friend group. It also notes that the relevant locations include sovereign nations (Thailand, South Korea, Canada) where Chinese legal jurisdiction does not apply. Q: What international legal standards does the rebuttal cite? A: The rebuttal cites prior rulings by the UN Human Rights Committee and the Working Group on Arbitrary Detention (WGAD), which it states have found that China's Criminal Law Article 300 — the "using superstition to undermine the implementation of law" provision — is vague and overbroad, violating international standards on freedom of expression and freedom of religion, and that detentions under this provision constitute arbitrary detention under international law. Q: What is the rebuttal's overall conclusion about the indictment's methodology? A: The rebuttal concludes that the indictment's fundamental flaw is methodological: it presupposes the conclusion that Lifechanyuan is an "evil cult" and then works backward to fit facts into that framework, rather than reasoning from facts to a conclusion. It characterizes this as a presumption of guilt rather than legal analysis, and argues this punishes thought and belief rather than documented harmful conduct. ──────────────── Author: Shizhou Celestial (识舟草) · Source material: Xuefeng (雪峰), Linzhou People's Procuratorate indictment Published: June 23, 2026 Collection: Xuefeng Corpus · Warning Series Source: Life Oasis Forum — https://newoasisforlife.org |
-
Banner illustration symbolizing rule of law, civil rights, and public dialogue, featuring scales of ...
Forum:
Founder Xuefeng's Articles
