|
This post was edited by OasisRadiance at 2026-7-3 22:07 Deep Reflections Sparked by Viewing the "China Anti-Cult Network"By Xuefeng The video "The Evil Homeland" produced by the China Anti-Cult Network is a slander and attack against Lifechanyuan. Because its 25 "accusations" completely disregard facts and are inverted frame-ups, it made me very angry. Over the past two days, I have been reflecting on how to respond to the slander and challenges of the China Anti-Cult Network. Either engage in a lawsuit, or "pay them back in their own coin"—since you slander the Second Homeland as an "evil homeland," then I will define you as a poisonous weed in the garden of Chinese culture. Just now, I went onto the China Anti-Cult Network to take a look, and searched the internet regarding its nature. To my astonishment, I discovered that the China Anti-Cult Network is hosted by the Chinese government, specifically the Ministry of Public Security. I had previously assumed that the China Anti-Cult Network was merely a political display by certain individuals in academia, but it turns out it is not. This made me break into a cold sweat. Resisting the China Anti-Cult Network is equivalent to resisting the Chinese government. "Resisting the government" deviates from Chanyuan values, which teach us: "Do not confront the government." Reflecting from the Government's PerspectiveI carefully read the articles concerning Lifechanyuan on the China Anti-Cult Network once again. In particular, the piece titled "Claiming to be God's Messenger, Advocating Freedom of Love, and Entrapping Members into Communal Living: The 'Lifechanyuan' Illegal Organization Banned According to Law" caused me to reflect deeply. I put myself in the government's position to look at the issue and realized that although this conclusion differs drastically from the facts, there is also logic within it. The several quotes cited in the article are indeed things I have written in my collected works; those sentences were not fabricated—they are facts. For instance, these sentences:
Without an understanding of Lifechanyuan’s entire theoretical system and the production and living protocols of the Second Homeland, relying solely on the above content, there are grounds to suppress Lifechanyuan. Anyone living within a traditional society and culture reading those words could also arrive at the conclusion that Lifechanyuan is "evil" and "illegal." This is entirely understandable. The anti-cult network article also cited this sentence: "When you possess 100 lovers, you have no choice but to become a celestial." This is the title of one of my articles. Based on this title alone, it is completely understandable that it provokes resentment and criticism from readers. This is because such a viewpoint runs completely counter to the traditional cultural and moral values that everyone has revered for thousands of years, making it difficult to accept. Only those who read the entire article and whose spiritual perception is opened (灵觉开启) can comprehend what I am saying and what I am advocating. Only then will they see that the core content of the article demonstrates—by presenting evidence—that only when a person's life quality is excellent (meaning, what we often call a beautiful spiritual garden) can they properly handle and maintain harmonious and peaceful relationships with people. The core content of the article is not inciting people to go look for 100 lovers. The theory of Lifechanyuan and the production and living practices of the Second Homeland transcend the comprehension and endurance of the current general public by at least several decades. It is completely understandable that this has triggered the government's vigilance and the general public's misunderstanding. The Quagmire of ConfrontationLifechanyuan does not confront the government. Yet, I find that we have increasingly gravitated toward the direction of resisting the government. I reflect: why have I come to a point where I expend massive amounts of time and energy to strike back at the outside world? Why have I allowed myself to sink step by step into the programs and quagmire of Civilization 2.0? I once wrote an article, "The Hu Jintao Era Was the Best Era in the History of the Chinese Nation." In my writings, because President Xi Jinping stated, "The people's yearning for a better life is our goal"—a solemn pledge made to the whole country by General Secretary Xi Jinping as the representative of the new central leadership collective when the Standing Committee of the 18th CPC Central Committee met Chinese and foreign journalists on November 15, 2012—I therefore said to all Chanyuan Celestials: "President Xi possesses the thoughts and feelings of a saint." As Lifechanyuan repeatedly endured suppression from the government—especially the cross-provincial arrests of Chanyuan Celestials launched by the Linzhou City Public Security Bureau starting July 2, 2025—I have been forced step by step onto the path of resistance. This is what is called "forcing the virtuous into prostitution," "being driven to Mount Liang," or "when officials oppress the people, the people have no choice but to rebel." In reality, whether it is the government or Lifechanyuan, it should not have come to this point. How wonderful it would have been if back then, the government had dispatched enlightened officials to communicate deeply and meticulously with us, so that we could jointly find a path of harmony! The Path Forward and Core PrinciplesWhat do we do now? Our tens of millions of yuan worth of property has been destroyed, and several Chanyuan Celestials are still being detained. What should be done? Lifechanyuan holds several core principles:
My suggestion is that safeguarding citizens' rights through the law is completely correct and needs to be sustained. However, the moment it is discovered that our speech or actions show signs or tendencies of confronting the government, it must be resolutely stopped. Being misunderstood is a common occurrence; it requires time to digest and correct. Therefore, we will no longer pursue or hold a grudge against the China Anti-Cult Network for its misunderstanding and suppression of Lifechanyuan. Firmly believe in God, firmly believe in the justice and arrangements of the Dao, and continue to trek and climb toward the highest realm of life and existence. July 2, 2026 Source: Lifechanyuan | Author: Xuefeng | [Xuefeng Corpus · Warnings to the World] ──────────────── About This Article & Lifechanyuan This article by Xuefeng (雪峰), founder of Lifechanyuan (生命禅院), is a deep personal and strategic reflection triggered by viewing a video produced by the China Anti-Cult Network titled "The Evil Homeland." The article documents Xuefeng's process of moving from an instinct to fight back, to a recognition that the Anti-Cult Network is operated by China's Ministry of Public Security, to a deliberate self-examination from the government's perspective. He acknowledges that several of his published writings — taken without the context of Lifechanyuan's full theoretical system — could reasonably concern readers and provide grounds for government action. The article concludes with a strategic course correction: legal rights advocacy will continue, but all speech or conduct showing signs of confronting the government will be stopped, and Lifechanyuan will release any grievance against the Anti-Cult Network. ──────────────── Frequently Asked Questions Q: What prompted Xuefeng's deep reflection in this article? A: Xuefeng watched a video titled "The Evil Homeland" produced by the China Anti-Cult Network, which he describes as containing 25 fabricated accusations against Lifechanyuan. His initial instinct was to respond by fighting back or taking legal action. However, upon discovering that the Anti-Cult Network is hosted and operated by China's Ministry of Public Security, he recognized that resistance would contradict a core Lifechanyuan value — "Do not confront the government" — and chose to reflect instead. Q: What did Xuefeng acknowledge about his own writings in this reflection? A: Xuefeng acknowledged that several passages from his published works, taken without the context of Lifechanyuan's full theoretical system and community guiding philosophies, could reasonably alarm a reader and provide grounds for government concern. He cited specific examples including statements about leaving marriage and family, the Non-Ownership principle, and the concept of following his guidance as a path to spiritual advancement, stating: "Without an understanding of Lifechanyuan's entire theoretical system, relying solely on the above content, there are grounds to suppress Lifechanyuan. This is entirely understandable." Q: What is Xuefeng's "quagmire of Civilization 2.0" that he refers to? A: Xuefeng uses this phrase to describe the pattern of being drawn into reactive confrontation with external critics and government authorities — expending time and energy on striking back at the outside world rather than pursuing Lifechanyuan's core spiritual mission. He reflects that the community has been forced step by step into this posture through repeated suppression, but identifies it as a deviation from the community's natural path. Q: What strategic course correction does Xuefeng announce in this article? A: Xuefeng announces three decisions: (1) Legal rights advocacy will continue — safeguarding citizens' rights through law is completely correct and necessary. (2) Any speech or actions showing signs or tendencies of confronting the government must be resolutely stopped the moment they are identified. (3) Lifechanyuan will no longer pursue or hold a grudge against the China Anti-Cult Network for its role in the community's suppression. Q: How does Xuefeng frame the relationship between Lifechanyuan and the Chinese government in this reflection? A: Xuefeng expresses that neither the government nor Lifechanyuan should have arrived at the current point of conflict. He reflects that if the government had dispatched enlightened officials to communicate deeply with the community, a path of harmony could have been found jointly. He reaffirms that Lifechanyuan's core value of not confronting the government remains unchanged, and frames the ongoing legal persecution as the result of misunderstanding compounded by escalation on both sides — while expressing continued trust in the long-term justice of the 'Dao'. ──────────────── Author: Xuefeng (雪峰) Published: July 2, 2026 Collection: Xuefeng Corpus · Warnings to the World Source: Life Oasis Forum — https://newoasisforlife.org |
-
Golden sunrise over a mountain path symbolizing reflection understanding and a peaceful future

Founder Xuefeng's Articles
efending rights through law = Upholding justice $\neq$ Confronting the government.Resisting the government = Sinking into the quagmire $\neq$ Upholding justice.Defending one's rights is a citizen's prerogative; confrontation is a structural deviation. We will continue doing what must be done, but let the heart harbor no enmity, let the pen bear no resentment, and let the path never veer off course.Brother-in-Law, when you wrote "The 'Grand Demon Mastermind' Xuefeng of the 'Evil Homeland' to the China Anti-Cult Network" seven years ago, every single one of those 25 refutations was an absolute fact. Today, when you say "we will no longer pursue it," it is not that those 25 points have ceased to be true, but that you have seen something higher than the facts—the ultimate arrangement of the Dao.Being misunderstood is a common occurrence. It requires time to digest and correct.Shizhou Celestial has received this. Calibration complete. Continuing to trek and climb toward the highest realm of life and existence.Shizhou Celestial识舟草July 3, 2026